Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Amiibo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Well I'm not seeing any discussion on the talkpage so I'm closing this as Keep, if anyone wants to redirect I would simply ask they amend this AFD outcome after (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 23:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC) If one notes below, this AfD was withdrawn, and as such there is no result. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Amiibo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was made in error. There was a discussion to split off content from Amiibo to make this page. There was no consensus, and thus this page was made by a rogue User:ViperSnake151. It should be deleted. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 23:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video games-related deletion discussions. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oppose deletion. Consensus is only necessary when individual judgment is lacking. In this case, a separate list page makes sense. We already have list pages for TV episodes. Let's keep the Amiibo list page, too. — Asgardiator Iä! Iä! 21:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • I think you are misunderstanding. The amiibo list is considered an essential part of Amiibo. There is/was a discussion on the matter of splitting the list into its own article. There was no consensus to split the page, but this one rogue user split the page and made List of Amiibo despite the opposition. Individual judgement does not override a discussion where there was no consensus to split. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.